C.Holmes....I remember that and was about to post on that every topic. I was sitting at a bar in G.I. when some locals just 'could not wait for them crazies to come protest.' I wish no harm on anyone, but have to admit a PETA protest at G.I. would have been very funny.

drewb....you calling someone out for using the word 'mine' as opposed to 'mind'. You just posted a comment on another thread where YOU spelled lady's underclothing as 'lingery' as opposed to the correct spelling of L-I-N-G-E-R-I-E. As to the issues in this thread, let be give you examples:
Common:
Admiral Rabbit making great comments;
Drewb making an argument that is baseless;
Drewb being wrong;
Drewb getting mad when corrected;

Uncommon:
Drewb paying off the bets he loses.

Deerhunter....Your post is completely correct. drewb is playing a word game to justify his previous incorrect statements. Ironic, a boy playing word games, who has no word. It is about time for one of the AdmRabbits great comments.

It will depend on what you seek to build. If you are not planning to construct any fixed structure then you will be fine. However, 'marshland' is a generic term used in the federal Wetland Act to put buyers on notice that the subject property falls under the 'wetlands' definition. It loosely defines a protected region under this federal act. If you plan to alter the property in any manner, you will need approval of the U.S. Corp of Engineers (which is a huge headache, even if you get approval). In addition, and depending on your property and intent of construction, you may have to reclaim and/or mitigate the property, which can be quite expensive.

Spec...Thanks for a very informative reply.

Acman, Curdog, Capt. JS....Please do not lose sleep over this boy. Drewb loves to make statements that are completely false. A couple of weeks ago, he made some false statements on a post, I corrected him, he got mad, then he went so far as to bet me as to this facts. I proved him wrong, and he still has not paid me. After that incident, he said he will never post here again. You know, like the little kid who loses the game, takes his toys and goes home mad. His facts are never correct, and he certainly is not a man of his word, in fact I am not sure he is a man.

Chris....With all due respect, I think your comments are partially right and partially wrong. Yes, you are right, the new law is great, long overdue and makes sense. As to 'there IS hope' ......not quite sure if you are right on that point.

PoppinCork....You may want to go to G & H in Raceland, Louisiana. The owner is a guy by the name of Eric. He is a Yamaha and Evinrude dealer. Great prices and even better service.

Nemo...No problem. I wish you a good and safe trip. Yes, google earth does show both canals. Cancienne is the frst canal north of Attakapas Landing. I think google earth labels the canal as such. The canal is a one canal system with no breakoffs. The next canal to the north is the Crackerhead system. In my opinion, and I say this will all respect, you should not venture far into that system of canals. Many many canals and is like a maze. I fished there all my life (48 years) and still feel lost sometimes.

NEMO.....North side of lake, where canals (Cancienne, Crackerhead) begin, but fished the lakeside of entrance. My 11 year old daughter caught two over three lbs on the new pop-r. Early morning top water. Then fished cypress knees for bream, crickets or worms.

Capt JS...How does that SHO on that haul compare to a 4stroke Yamaha?

PFC....You are very right about Capt. Bob and his desire to share info. Years ago while he worked at a marine dealership in Lafourche Parish he would eagerly share his knowledge of bass fishing. Not many fisherman, Capts or otherwise are as willing to provide such an educational tool as he does. I watch his show on LCN so I have no viewing problems, but hope your issues are resolved soon.

Capt. Ron.....I agree with a previous post-For you to recommend someone else says a whole much about you as a person. Great job, honest, high morals, and hopefully two 11 year olds will have a time they will never forget because in some part you are a great person.

drewb...I am a liar because I challenged you on facts over and over, and consistently and without fail proved you wrong. I sent you several personal emails, but you fail to respond. I guess your big and bad when you hiding behind a screen...you take the term 'screen savers' to a new level. Why do you not response to my emails and give me the chance to prove to you your errors and false assumptions.

Anyway, you and your buddy leaving are not surprising, it is simply the CCA way...argue a position polar opposite of your stated public organizational mission, used flawed data in support of that position, then disappear from that isse when proven wrong.

Again, drewb, I would love to take you up on your challenge, just please email me.

Motorboat, you cited more than one case, read your own post. And again you cited a case than has been overturned by recent Supreme Court rulings and only effects 1/5 of the state. You also completely ignored the 14th amendment in your argument. Maybe you made a typo on the citation, but were the overturn, irrelevant, and unsubtantated law review article also typo's.

motorboat....What you putting out there is bad law. You cited four cases, all of which have been overturned or have no bearing on public right of ways. The Vaughn case is a state 3rd Cir. opinion that has no bearing on any other of the five circuits in this state. Moreover, subsequent Lousiana Supreme Court cases have been rendered with trump your Vaughn matter.

You cite La. Rev. Stat. 14:1701. That staute does not even exist anymore.

I will chill out as you recommend, when you quit naking unfounded misleading facts.

Ironically, when someone does try to interject an opinion, you (as does drewb claim they are trolls). If you both would get your facts straight before you attempt to create arguments,your feelings would not be hurt when you are proved to be wrong.

motorboat...The higher the monkey climbs the pole the more his butt shows, and yours is starting to show. The cases you cite in support of your position have been over ruled by either the U.S. Supreme Court or the La. State Supreme court. Moreover, read the 14th amendment and its restrictions before you start citing crazy federal propositions for purely state issues.

So, you my friend, please do a little shepardizing before you cite some laws. The public trust doctrine article you cite is a law review article which has no standing in court. Finally the statute I quoted along with three others have case law which courts have interpreted to allow public entity's the right to emminent domain during certain bonding issues.

My point of making that argument is because you wrongfully degraded someone for saying that community property and public asset issues are only involving domestic disputes. You were wrong again.

It is quit hard to have an inteliigent argument when we are one intellect short.

drewb...I cannot believe you just chastised someone for making personal attacks. You are the expert of such attacks, even when they are false. So much that you last rant had to be taken down from this website because of false and misleading lies. Heck, I sent you a personal email, yet you failed to respond.

drewb...I could not help but see your referenced to my early comments on another post. I just sent you a personal email. As I said my money is in hand, name place and time. Just waiting on you.

Drewb....I never claimed to be a MMA fighter, but you like to go to a gun fight with a knife. Let me explain, you make absurd arguments with no supportive facts, then you either admit you wrong, or refuse to address the previous assertion.

As to my degrees, put your moeny where you mouth is $10,000 says I got the degree I claim to have.
Please, do not let your mouth write a check your a#@ cannot over.

I also see you yet to answer my questions!!

drewb...finally you got something right. I am a hoot. But seriously, there is no way you run in any major circles and I will tell you why:

1. To brag and support a group that you finally admit you had not even attended a meeting in 4 years but only get your info from 'friends' who volunteer. Not even 'friends' in leadership roles;

2. You state that CCA apologized, then when challenged to that fact, you recant and say you were wrong;

3. You consistently make personal attacks, most generally when your points are challenged and you have no response;

4. You claim you know my livelihood but you are completely wrong.

Either one of these four errors would get you laughed out of any major corporate/lobby circles...but all four. You would be laughed at in Washington and Baton Rouge more than CCA is already being laughed at.

If someone is passionate about a cause, makes factual assertions that are correct and can be supported, and will not be afraid to challenge a group (CCA) about its actions conflicting with its very own mission statement, is a hoot, then I must be a hoot. Thanks for the compliment!